Visualization & Imagery

What is Light Body Visualization?

Light Body Visualization is a contemplative practice in which you imagine the body as radiant light and gradually release identification with solid physical form. The practitioner holds a detailed image of the body as luminosity, attends to subtle felt sensations, and lets identification move from the material body toward a quieter, more spacious awareness.

Experiential Practice

Last Updated

4 Jul 2026

We are still reviewing this page. Our research team checks every technique page for accuracy and evidence quality before final release. Details may change as that review completes. The evidence badge shows our current reading of the published research.

RECOMMENDED DOSE

How Much Should You Practice?

No direct dose evidence; editorial synthesis. A short, low-commitment introduction to guided visualization helps build the habit without strain. Treat this as a starting point only.

No direct dose evidence; editorial synthesis. Once the practice feels familiar, a moderate increase in session length and frequency supports deeper engagement. These figures reflect general meditation practice conventions rather than technique-specific research.

No direct dose evidence; editorial synthesis. A longer daily practice suits committed practitioners maintaining an established routine. This upper range is inferred from common meditation practice patterns, not from studies of this technique.

Session length

Session length: 5–10 minutes

MIN

How long each individual practice session should last from start to finish.

Frequency

Frequency: 3–4 days

DAYS

The number of days per week to fit a session into your routine.

Session length

Session length: 15–20 minutes

MIN

How long each individual practice session should last from start to finish.

Frequency

Frequency: 4–5 days

DAYS

The number of days per week to fit a session into your routine.

Session length

Session length: 20–30 minutes

MIN

How long each individual practice session should last from start to finish.

Frequency

Frequency: 6–7 days

DAYS

The number of days per week to fit a session into your routine.

About this card. No direct dose-response literature exists for Light Body Visualization. These recommendations are based on general practice conventions for visualization/meditation and should be treated as starting points only. These recommendations are not a substitute for personalised guidance from a qualified practitioner.

Related Techniques to Light Body Visualization

White Light Meditation

Color Breathing

Common questions about Light Body Visualization

Quick answers to what people most often ask. Each card links to the deeper section below.

evidence

What does the research say about Light Body Visualization?

No clinical trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses have tested Light Body Visualization directly, so no outcome is proven. The practice rests on Tibetan Buddhist rainbow-body and Theosophical traditions, plus general research on adjacent skills like focused attention and stepping back from thoughts. Treat its benefits as promising possibilities, not established results.

good for

Who is Light Body Visualization good for?

Light Body Visualization tends to suit people already drawn to contemplative or subtle-body traditions, and those wanting a way into concentration, deep presence, or a lighter relationship with the physical body. Because no trials have studied it, these are reasons drawn from its structure, not proof that it treats anxiety, depression, or any diagnosed condition.

safety

Is Light Body Visualization safe?

Most healthy adults find Light Body Visualization gentle and low-risk. Because it deliberately loosens the felt sense of a solid body, a small number of people may feel disoriented or briefly unreal. People with dissociation, recent trauma, or a psychosis-spectrum condition should practise cautiously with professional support. This caution is inferred from how the practice works, not measured.

how it works

How does Light Body Visualization work?

Light Body Visualization works by giving attention one demanding target: a detailed image of the body as light that must be held and refreshed moment to moment. This anchoring rests focus on a single object so the mind stops drifting, and thoughts start to feel like passing weather rather than the whole sky. Effects are inferred from adjacent practices.

For clinicians, researchers, and curious readers

What's in a session?

How does it work?

What does it do to the body?

What is it used for?

What does the research say?

Where does it come from?

Is it safe?Who should practise with care?How to practise safely?

How does it compare?

What does a Light Body Visualization session involve?

Light Body Visualization is a contemplative practice of imagining the body as radiant light and gradually releasing identification with solid physical form.

In a guided or self-directed session, the practitioner holds a vivid image of the whole body as radiant, translucent light, attends to subtle felt sensations such as warmth, tingling, or a sense of flow, and gradually lets identification shift from solid physical form toward luminous awareness. Sessions rest on sustained, detailed visualization and single-pointed attention, so the practice tends to deepen with repetition rather than arriving all at once.

Unlike a body scan or relaxation imagery, which stay with ordinary physical sensation, this practice works to let the felt sense of solid form soften into light. Despite the shared word 'light,' it is not light therapy or bright-light treatment, and it is not a proven clinical intervention. It should also not be confused with sleep-oriented practices such as Yoga Nidra.

Not to be confused with

Rainbow body (jalü) attainment

The everyday practice borrows imagery from jalü, the Tibetan account of a fully realized practitioner's body dissolving into light at death. The visualization is a meditative exercise using that image, not a claim to have reached that attainment.

Astral projection / out-of-body practices

Light Body Visualization is an imaginative concentration practice done within your own felt body. It does not aim to send awareness out of the body or travel elsewhere; the attention stays with the imagined luminosity of your own form.

Aura reading / energy healing of others

This is an inward, first-person practice of imagining your own body as light. It is not about perceiving, diagnosing, or manipulating other people's energy fields.

How does Light Body Visualization work?

Light Body Visualization appears to work by giving attention a single demanding target: a detailed image of the body as light that has to be held and refreshed moment to moment. This draws on attentional anchoring, the act of resting focus on one clear object so the mind stops drifting into worry, which many people feel as a quieter, more gathered state. As the image is held, decentering can set in, and thoughts and feelings start to feel like weather passing through rather than the whole sky, so you notice them without being pulled under. The research on these processes comes from adjacent contemplative practices, not from studies of Light Body Visualization itself.

What does Light Body Visualization do to the body?

What happens in the body during Light Body Visualization has not been measured directly, so this picture is inferred from how similar attention and imagery practices behave. Sustaining a vivid inner image and attending to subtle sensations such as warmth, tingling, or a sense of flow tends to engage somatosensory and interoceptive processing, the brain's tracking of body sensation, which practitioners often feel as a soft, buzzing aliveness under the skin. Broader meditation research, not studies of this technique, links this kind of focused, self-observing attention to quieter default-mode activity, the background hum of self-referential thinking, felt as fewer spiraling thoughts. Treat these as plausible directions rather than confirmed physiological findings for Light Body Visualization.

What is Light Body Visualization used for?

There is no direct clinical evidence for Light Body Visualization to date: no controlled trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses have tested it as a distinct practice, so no outcome can be labelled proven. What can fairly be said is that the skills it exercises, focused attention, sustained mental imagery, decentering, and interoceptive awareness, are studied in adjacent contemplative practices and are plausibly why people report improved focus, a quieter mind, and a sense of expanded presence. What is not supported: any claim that it treats anxiety, depression, or a diagnosed condition, and any statement about who benefits, on which outcome, or by how much.

What does the research say about Light Body Visualization?

No study has tested Light Body Visualization directly, and there are no controlled trials, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses of it as a specific technique. What exists are descriptions from Tibetan Buddhist and Theosophical contemplative traditions, plus general research on the skills it draws on, such as focused attention and stepping back from your own thoughts, studied in other practices rather than this one. That makes it worth exploring for presence and concentration while holding its specific benefits as suggestive possibilities, not established outcomes.

The central limitation is the absence of any direct research: no randomized trials, cohort studies, or reviews have evaluated Light Body Visualization, so its effects, ideal candidates, and risks are all unquantified. Mechanism claims are read across from adjacent contemplative practices and remain inference rather than demonstration, and the practice's deliberate loosening of bodily boundaries carries a plausible but unstudied risk of disorientation for vulnerable people.

Read the full reference list

Where does Light Body Visualization come from?

Light Body Visualization traces to Tibetan Buddhist rainbow-body practices known as jalü, alongside Theosophical traditions and various yogic systems, where the person is understood as a field of subtle energy and luminous awareness as much as solid flesh. These roots help explain the form and continuity of the practice, the sustained luminous imagery and the gradual dissolving of solid body into light, not its clinical effects. The tradition gives the imagery its meaning and coherence; it is not, on its own, evidence that the practice produces a measurable outcome.

Is Light Body Visualization safe?

For most healthy adults, Light Body Visualization is a gentle, low-risk practice, and letting the sense of a solid body soften into imagined light feels calming or quietly freeing to many people. Because the practice deliberately loosens the felt sense of a bounded physical body, a small number of people may feel disoriented or notice depersonalization, a sense of watching themselves from a slight distance or feeling faintly unreal. This caution is drawn from how the practice works rather than from any measured effect, since no controlled research has tested this technique. Keeping early sessions short and returning to plain body sensations afterward is a simple way to stay steady.

Who should practise with care?

People living with dissociation, a felt detachment from the body or surroundings, a recent trauma history, or a psychosis-spectrum condition should take particular care, because a practice built on dissolving the sense of solid form could deepen feelings of unreality for them. This caution is practice-informed and inferred from the mechanism rather than established by safety research. Anyone in an acute mental-health crisis should treat this as a possible complement to professional care, not a replacement for it, and ideally practise alongside a clinician who knows them. Starting gently and stopping if a session leaves you feeling ungrounded is the sensible default.

Feeling detached or unreal during practice

lowpractice-informed

Because Light Body Visualization deliberately loosens the felt sense of a solid, bounded body, a small number of people may feel disoriented or notice depersonalization, a sense of watching themselves from a slight distance or feeling faintly unreal. This caution comes from how the practice works rather than from any measured effect, since no controlled research has tested this technique. Keep early sessions short, hold a light anchor to ordinary body sensation, and return to plain sensations afterward to stay steady.

Trauma history, dissociation, or psychosis-spectrum conditions

low

How does Light Body Visualization compare to similar techniques?

Technique	Best for	Use with care	Evidence strength	Distinction
Body Scan Meditation	Building steady, grounded body awareness and easing into rest without any spiritual framing.		EVIDENCE	A body scan moves attention slowly through physical sensations as they actually are, building the felt sense of the body and a settling toward rest. Light Body Visualization does close to the opposite: it gradually replaces that solid, sensed body with imagined radiant light, aiming at de-identification from physical form rather than closer contact with it.
Chakra Visualization / Energy Body Meditation	Practitioners drawn to working point-by-point with specific energy centres inside a subtle-body framework.		EVIDENCE	Chakra practices concentrate attention on specific energy centres along the body, one location at a time. Light Body Visualization works with the whole body at once as a single field of luminosity, so the emphasis falls on unified radiance and dissolving form rather than on discrete centres.

Glossary

Subtle body

In contemplative traditions, the idea that a person is more than solid flesh, also a field of vital energy and awareness. In this practice it is the layer the imagery addresses, felt as warmth, tingling, or a sense of flow rather than measured physiology.

A traditional interpretive framework (Tibetan Buddhist, Theosophical, yogic) describing non-material energetic dimensions of the person; used here as source-context, not as a validated physiological entity.

Rainbow body (jalü)

A Tibetan Buddhist account of an advanced practitioner whose physical body dissolves into light at death. The visualization practice draws its central image from this idea without claiming the attainment itself.

De-identification from physical form

The gradual loosening of the felt sense of being a solid, bounded body, so that you experience yourself less as fixed flesh and more as open awareness or light. Most people find this freeing, though for some it can feel disorienting.

Decentering

The shift from being caught inside your thoughts and feelings to watching them as passing mental events. It tends to feel like a little more room around a worry, so you are less swept along by it.

The metacognitive capacity to observe thoughts and emotions as transient events rather than facts about self, reducing automatic reactivity; also termed cognitive defusion.

Sustained visualization

Holding a vivid, detailed mental image steady over time without it fading or your attention wandering off. It feels like effortful focus at first and steadier, more absorbed concentration with practice.

Maintenance of voluntary, detailed mental imagery over an extended period, drawing on visual working memory and sustained attention circuits.

Subtle energy awareness

Attention turned toward felt sensations the tradition describes as energy, such as warmth, pulsing, tingling, or flow within and around the body. It is distinct from sensing ordinary signals like heartbeat or breath.

Full References

[1]other peer reviewed

Peng Xiaolan, Lin Jia, Zhu Yingdong, Liu Xiuyun, Zhang Yinglan, Ji Yongxia (2016). Anxiety-related behavioral responses of pentylenetetrazole-treated zebrafish larvae to light-dark transitions.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2016.03.010

DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2016.03.010

Cited in: –

[2]other peer reviewed

Ye-Shih Ho, Ye Xiong, Wanchao Ma, Abraham Spector, Dorothy S. Ho (2004). Mice Lacking Catalase Develop Normally but Show Differential Sensitivity to Oxidant Tissue Injury. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m404800200

DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m404800200

Cited in: –

People living with dissociation, a felt detachment from the body or surroundings, a recent trauma history, or a psychosis-spectrum condition should take particular care, because a practice built on dissolving the sense of solid form could deepen feelings of unreality. This caution is practice-informed and inferred from the mechanism rather than established by safety research. Anyone in an acute mental-health crisis should treat this as a possible complement to professional care, not a replacement, and ideally practise alongside a clinician who knows them. Start gently and stop if a session leaves you feeling ungrounded.

How to practise safely?

Light Body Visualization is best approached gently, in a comfortable and undisturbed place where softening your attention on the body feels supported rather than exposed. A sensible starting format is just a few minutes at a time, keeping a light touch on ordinary sensation so you stay connected to your physical body even as its edges seem to soften. Let the imagery feel calming rather than something to push through, and give yourself plenty of room to return to everyday sensation whenever you need to.

Settle into a safe, quiet setting

Choose a comfortable, undisturbed place where you can sit or lie down, so that softening attention on the body feels supported rather than exposed.

Begin with short sessions

Start with just a few minutes of imagining the body as light and build up gradually, giving yourself time to learn how the shift in felt sense affects you before extending the practice.

Keep a simple anchor

Hold light contact with ordinary sensation throughout, such as the weight of your body on the surface beneath you or the movement of the breath, so you stay connected to the physical body even as its edges seem to soften.

Track how you feel as you go

Notice whether the dissolving imagery feels calming or unsettling, and if you begin to feel floaty, detached, or unreal in a way that distresses you, gently ease the imagery back rather than pushing through.

Ground before you finish

Close each session by returning attention to concrete sensations, such as feet on the floor, hands touching, and a few fuller breaths, until you feel clearly back in your everyday body.

Seek support when needed

If you have a trauma history, dissociative tendencies, or a psychosis-spectrum condition, practise alongside a trusted teacher or clinician, and stop and reach out for support if a session leaves you feeling destabilized.

Medical Disclaimer

This information is educational and is not medical advice. This practice is not a substitute for professional care and should not replace prescribed medication or treatment for any medical or mental-health condition. If you are managing a health condition or taking medication, talk with a qualified health professional before changing your practice. If you are in distress or crisis, seek professional support.

Does light body visualization actually work, or is it just tradition?

Neither fully. No clinical trials, reviews, or meta-analyses have tested Light Body Visualization, so none of its benefits can be called proven. It is more than tradition alone, though: the attention and imagery skills it draws on are studied in related practices, which makes its benefits plausible rather than demonstrated.

Neither fully. Light Body Visualization has not been tested in any trial, review, or meta-analysis as a distinct practice, so no outcome can be called proven. It rests on Tibetan Buddhist and Theosophical contemplative traditions, which shape what the practice is rather than show what it does. What lifts it past tradition alone is mechanism plausibility: the focused attention, sustained mental imagery, and decentering, watching thoughts as passing events, that it exercises are studied in adjacent practices, so reported benefits are plausible rather than demonstrated. Treat it as worth exploring for presence and concentration, not as a proven or treatment approach.

Can light body visualization help with focus and a quieter mind?

Plausibly, but not proven. Holding a demanding image of the body as light asks attention to rest on one target, which may support focus and a calmer mind. This is inferred from related contemplative practices, not measured in any trial of this technique.

Plausibly, though this is inferred rather than measured. Holding a vivid luminous image draws on attentional anchoring, resting focus on one clear object so the mind stops drifting, and it can prompt decentering, where thoughts begin to feel like passing weather rather than facts. No controlled trials, reviews, or meta-analyses have tested Light Body Visualization directly, so these reasons come from adjacent practices and the technique's structure, not from demonstrated outcomes for this practice.

Why does imagining the body as light make the mind feel calmer?

Likely because holding one vivid image gives attention a single demanding target, so it stops drifting into worry, a process called attentional anchoring, while watching thoughts pass like weather loosens their grip through decentering. These are mechanism-inferred reasons from related practices, not proven effects of this technique.

The calmer feeling probably comes from two attention processes rather than anything measured in this practice directly. Attentional anchoring means resting focus on one clear object, the detailed image of the body as light, so the mind has less room to spiral into worry, which many people feel as a quieter, more gathered state. Decentering is the shift from being caught inside thoughts to watching them as passing mental events, which tends to feel like a little more space around a concern. Both are studied in adjacent focused-attention and defusion practices, not in Light Body Visualization itself, so treat them as plausible explanations rather than established outcomes.

Why might I feel tingling or warmth during the practice?

Most likely because you are directing sustained attention to subtle body sensations, which tends to heighten somatosensory and interoceptive processing, your brain's tracking of inner body signals, and can surface as warmth or tingling. This is inferred from related attention and imagery practices, not measured for Light Body Visualization itself.

Most likely because focusing closely on the body amplifies what you already sense. In Light Body Visualization you turn sustained attention toward subtle sensations, and research on adjacent contemplative practices links that kind of focus to heightened somatosensory and interoceptive processing, the brain's tracking of inner body signals, felt as warmth, pulsing, or tingling. This explanation is read across from similar practices rather than demonstrated for this technique, since no study has measured what happens in the body during Light Body Visualization. Read it as a plausible mechanism, not a confirmed cause or a sign of literal energy.

Can light body visualization make you feel detached or unreal?

Occasionally, yes. Because the practice deliberately loosens the felt sense of a solid body, a small number of people may feel disoriented or briefly depersonalized, a sense of watching yourself from a distance or feeling faintly unreal. This is inferred from how the practice works, not measured in any trial. Keep early sessions short and ground afterward.

Occasionally, yes. Imagining the body dissolving into light can, for some people, bring on depersonalization, a sense of being detached from yourself or slightly unreal, because the practice intentionally softens the felt sense of being a solid, bounded body. No study has measured how often this happens for this technique, so treat it as a mechanism-inferred caution rather than a confirmed effect. Returning attention to plain sensations, feet on the floor, hands touching, fuller breaths, helps you settle. People living with dissociation, a trauma history, or a psychosis-spectrum condition should take particular care and ideally practise with professional support.

Is light body visualization safe if I have a trauma history or dissociation?

Use care. No trials have tested Light Body Visualization, so it cannot be called proven safe or unsafe. Because it deliberately loosens the felt sense of a solid body, it may deepen unreality or depersonalization if you have a trauma history or dissociation, so approach it gently and alongside a clinician.

Use care. There is no safety research on Light Body Visualization itself, so this is a practical, mechanism-inferred caution rather than an evidence-based safety determination. Because the practice works by softening the sense of a bounded physical body, it can heighten depersonalization, a feeling of being detached or faintly unreal, for people with a trauma history, dissociation, or a psychosis-spectrum condition. Keep early sessions short, hold a light anchor to ordinary body sensation, ground afterward, and treat it as a possible complement to professional care rather than a replacement for it.

How do I start light body visualization as a beginner?

Start small and safe: pick a quiet, undisturbed spot, imagine your body as light for just a few minutes, and keep light contact with ordinary sensation, your weight on the seat, your breath, as an anchor. Ground before finishing by returning to concrete sensations. This is tradition- and mechanism-based guidance, not trial-tested, and not a substitute for care.

Begin gently. Settle into a comfortable, undisturbed setting, keep the first sessions short, and hold a simple anchor to plain body sensation so you stay connected to the physical body even as its edges seem to soften. Notice whether the imagery feels calming or unsettling; if you feel floaty or unreal in a distressing way, ease the imagery back rather than pushing through, and close by returning attention to feet, hands, and a few fuller breaths. These onboarding steps come from the practice's structure and contemplative tradition, not from studies of the technique itself. If you have a trauma history, dissociative tendencies, or a psychosis-spectrum condition, practise alongside a trusted teacher or clinician.

What's the difference between light body visualization and a body scan?

They pull in opposite directions. A body scan moves attention through physical sensations as they actually are, building grounded body awareness and rest, while Light Body Visualization replaces that solid, sensed body with imagined radiant light to loosen identification with physical form. Neither has been shown more effective, since no trials have tested this technique.

They differ in aim and in which way attention travels. A body scan brings you closer to the felt, physical body, noticing weight, warmth, and tension as they are, which tends toward settling and rest. Light Body Visualization does close to the reverse: it holds a detailed image of the body as luminous light and gradually dissolves the sense of solid form, aiming at de-identification from the physical body rather than closer contact with it. This describes how the two practices work, not a claim that one outperforms the other, because no controlled research has tested Light Body Visualization.

Interoceptive and somatosensory attention directed at sensations framed within traditional energy anatomy; described in source-context terms, not established as perception of a measurable energy.

Interoception

The felt sense of your body's inner state, the quiet background awareness of breath, heartbeat, warmth, or tension. This practice touches it while directing attention toward sensations it frames as energetic.

Self-transcendence

An experience of the usual sense of a separate self loosening or opening into something wider. In this practice it can feel like boundaries softening as the body is imagined as light.

[3]other peer reviewed

Yiming Bai, Harrison Liu, Bo Huang, Mahendra Wagle, Su Guo (2016). Identification of environmental stressors and validation of light preference as a measure of anxiety in larval zebrafish. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0298-z

DOI: 10.1186/s12868-016-0298-z

Cited in: –

[4]other peer reviewed

Magno Lílian Danielle Paiva, Fontes Aldo, Gonçalves Beatriz Maria Necy, Gouveia Amauri (2015). Pharmacological study of the light/dark preference test in zebrafish (Danio rerio): Waterborne administration.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2015.05.014

DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.05.014

Cited in: –

[5]other peer reviewed

Amelia D. Dahlén, Mahendra Wagle, Mahdi Zarei, Su Guo, Dahlén Amelia, Wagle Mahendra (2019). Heritable natural variation of light/dark preference in an outbred zebrafish population.. https://doi.org/10.1080/01677063.2019.1663846

DOI: 10.1080/01677063.2019.1663846

Cited in: –

[6]other peer reviewed

Fontana Barbara D, Gibbon Alistair J, Cleal Madeleine, Norton William H J, Parker Matthew O (2021). Chronic unpredictable early-life stress (CUELS) protocol: Early-life stress changes anxiety levels of adult zebrafish.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110087

DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110087

Cited in: –

[7]other peer reviewed

Tracey L. Sletten, Victoria L. Revell, Benita Middleton, Katharina A. Lederle, Debra J. Skene (2009). Age-Related Changes in Acute and Phase-Advancing Responses to Monochromatic Light. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730408328973

DOI: 10.1177/0748730408328973

Cited in: –

[8]other peer reviewed

Carolina Guidolin, Sam Aerts, Gabriel Kwaku Agbeshie, Kwadwo Owusu Akuffo, Sema Nur Aydin, David Baeza Moyano (2024). Protocol for a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study to assess personal light exposure. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20206-4

DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20206-4

Cited in: –

[9]randomized controlled trial

Vethe Daniel, Scott Jan, Engstrøm Morten, Salvesen Øyvind, Sand Trond, Olsen Alexander (2021). The evening light environment in hospitals can be designed to produce less disruptive effects on the circadian system and improve sleep.. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa194

DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa194

Cited in: –

[10]other peer reviewed

Facciol Amanda, Tran Steven, Gerlai Robert (2017). Re-examining the factors affecting choice in the light-dark preference test in zebrafish.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.040

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.040

Cited in: –

[11]other peer reviewed

Richendrfer H, Pelkowski S D, Colwill R M, Creton R (2012). On the edge: pharmacological evidence for anxiety-related behavior in zebrafish larvae.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.041

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.041

Cited in: –

[12]other peer reviewed

Taisuke Eto, Shigekazu Higuchi (2023). Review on age-related differences in non-visual effects of light: melatonin suppression, circadian phase shift and pupillary light reflex in children to older adults. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-023-00328-1

DOI: 10.1186/s40101-023-00328-1

Cited in: –

[13]other peer reviewed

Müller Talise E, Dos Santos Matheus M, Ferreira Sabrina A, Claro Mariana T, de Macedo Gabriel T, Fontana Barbara D (2024). Negative impacts of social isolation on behavior and neuronal functions are recovered after short-term social reintroduction in zebrafish.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111038

DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111038

Cited in: –

[14]other peer reviewed

Sarah L. Chellappa, Roland Steiner, Peter Blattner, Peter Oelhafen, Thomas Götz, Christian Cajochen (2011). Non-Visual Effects of Light on Melatonin, Alertness and Cognitive Performance: Can Blue-Enriched Light Keep Us Alert?. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016429

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016429

Cited in: –

[15]other peer reviewed

Champagne Danielle L, Hoefnagels Carlijn C M, de Kloet Ronald E, Richardson Michael K (2010). Translating rodent behavioral repertoire to zebrafish (Danio rerio): relevance for stress research.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.001

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.001

Cited in: –

[16]other peer reviewed

Mirjam Münch, Karine Scheuermaier, R. Zhang, S.P. Dunne, Aaron M. Guzik, E.J. Silva (2011). Effects on subjective and objective alertness and sleep in response to evening light exposure in older subjects. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.029

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.029

Cited in: –

[17]other peer reviewed

Elana Kysil, Darya A. Meshalkina, Erin E. Frick, David J. Echevarria, Denis B. Rosemberg, Caio Maximino (2017). Comparative Analyses of Zebrafish Anxiety-Like Behavior Using Conflict-Based Novelty Tests.. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2016.1415

DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2016.1415

Cited in: –

[18]other peer reviewed

Christine Blume, Mirjam Münch (2025). Effects of light on biological functions and human sleep. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-90918-1.00008-3

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-90918-1.00008-3

Cited in: –

[19]other peer reviewed

Jing Wu, Binhong Yan, Mengyi Bao, Jue Shen, Peilei Zheng, Dian Wu (2022). Early life exposure to chronic unpredictable stress induces anxiety-like behaviors and increases the excitability of cerebellar neurons in zebrafish. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114160

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114160

Cited in: –

[20]other peer reviewed

Rachel Blaser, Leah Chadwick, Gabrielle McGinnis (2009). Behavioral measures of anxiety in zebrafish (Danio rerio). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.11.009

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.11.009

Cited in: –

[21]other peer reviewed

Ludovic S. Mure (2021). Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells of the Human Retina. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.636330

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.636330

Cited in: –

[22]other peer reviewed

Wagle Mahendra, Nguyen Juliana, Lee Shinwoo, Zaitlen Noah, Guo Su (2017). Heritable natural variation of an anxiety-like behavior in larval zebrafish.. https://doi.org/10.1080/01677063.2017.1343827

DOI: 10.1080/01677063.2017.1343827

Cited in: –

[23]other peer reviewed

Magno Lílian Danielle Paiva, Fontes Aldo, Gonçalves Beatriz Maria Necy, Gouveia Amauri (2015). Reprint of "Pharmacological study of the light/dark preference test in zebrafish (Danio rerio): Waterborne administration".. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2015.11.001

DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.11.001

Cited in: –

[24]other peer reviewed

Green A, Cohen-Zion M, Haim A, Dagan Y (2018). Comparing the response to acute and chronic exposure to short wavelength lighting emitted from computer screens.. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2017.1387555

DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1387555

Cited in: –

[25]other peer reviewed

Kevin A. Mazurek, Linhao Li, Robert J. Klein, Shengliang Rong, Aidan F. Mullan, David Jones (2024). Investigating the effects of indoor lighting on measures of brain health in older adults: protocol for a cross-over randomized controlled trial. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04594-7

DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04594-7

Cited in: –

[26]other peer reviewed

Peter J. Steenbergen, Michael K. Richardson, Danielle L. Champagne, Steenbergen Peter J, Richardson Michael K, Champagne Danielle L (2011). Patterns of avoidance behaviours in the light/dark preference test in young juvenile zebrafish: a pharmacological study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.025

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.025

Cited in: –

[27]other peer reviewed

Zhong Zhaomin, Tan Xiaohui, An Xingna, Li Jie, Cai Jing, Jiang Yunchun (2024). Administration of blue light in the morning and no blue-ray light in the evening improves the circadian functions of non-24-hour shift workers.. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2024.2305218

DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2024.2305218

Cited in: –

[28]other peer reviewed

Sarah L. Chellappa, Vivien Bromundt, Sylvia R. Frey, Christian Cajochen (2021). Age-related neuroendocrine and alerting responses to light. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-021-00333-1

DOI: 10.1007/s11357-021-00333-1

Cited in: –

[29]other peer reviewed

Manuel Spitschan, Nayantara Santhi (2022). Individual differences and diversity in human physiological responses to light. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103640

DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103640

Cited in: –

[30]other peer reviewed

Angus C. Burns, Andrew J. K. Phillips, Martin K. Rutter, Richa Saxena, Sean W. Cain, Jacqueline M. Lane (2022). Genome-wide gene by environment study of time spent in daylight and chronotype identifies emerging genetic architecture underlying light sensitivity. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsac287

DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsac287

Cited in: –

[31]other peer reviewed

Archana Golla, Henrik Østby, Florence Kermen (2020). Chronic unpredictable stress induces anxiety-like behaviors in young zebrafish. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67182-4

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67182-4

Cited in: –

[32]other peer reviewed

Manuel Spitschan, Laura Kervezee, Renske Lok, Elise M. McGlashan, Raymond P. Najjar, Annette E. Allen (2023). ENLIGHT: A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the non-visual effects of light in humans. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104889

DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104889

Cited in: –

[33]other peer reviewed

Song Cai, Yang Lei, Wang JiaJia, Chen Peirong, Li Shaomin, Liu Yingcong (2016). Building neurophenomics in zebrafish: Effects of prior testing stress and test batteries.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.05.005

DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.05.005

Cited in: –

[34]other peer reviewed

Anne‐Marie Chang, Frank A. J. L. Scheer, Charles A. Czeisler, Daniel Aeschbach (2013). Direct Effects of Light on Alertness, Vigilance, and the Waking Electroencephalogram in Humans Depend on Prior Light History. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.2894

DOI: 10.5665/sleep.2894

Cited in: –

[35]other peer reviewed

Antoine Viola, Lynette M. James, Luc J. M. Schlangen, Derk‐Jan Dijk (2008). Blue-enriched white light in the workplace improves self-reported alertness, performance and sleep quality. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1268

DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1268

Cited in: –

[36]other peer reviewed

Fatemeh Fazlali, Rafael Lazar, Faady Yahya, Oliver Stefani, Manuel Spitschan, Christian Cajochen (2025). Sex and Seasonal Variations in Melatonin Suppression and Alerting Response to Light. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf155

DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvaf155

Cited in: –

[37]other peer reviewed

Stefani Oliver, Freyburger Marlène, Veitz Simon, Basishvili Tamara, Meyer Martin, Weibel Janine (2021). Changing color and intensity of LED lighting across the day impacts on circadian melatonin rhythms and sleep in healthy men.. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12714

DOI: 10.1111/jpi.12714

Cited in: –

[38]other peer reviewed

Zoltán K. Varga, Áron Zsigmond, Diána Pejtsik, Máté Varga, Kornél Demeter, Éva Mikics (2018). The swimming plus-maze test: a novel high-throughput model for assessment of anxiety-related behaviour in larval and juvenile zebrafish (Danio rerio).. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34989-1

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34989-1

Cited in: –

[39]other peer reviewed

Sumana Chakravarty, Bommana Raghunath Reddy, Sreesha R. Sudhakar, Sandeep Saxena, Tapatee Das, Meghah Vuppalapaty (2013). Chronic Unpredictable Stress (CUS)-Induced Anxiety and Related Mood Disorders in a Zebrafish Model: Altered Brain Proteome Profile Implicates Mitochondrial Dysfunction. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063302

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063302

Cited in: –

[40]other peer reviewed

Donghan Zheng, Dan Wang, Shuo Zhang, Yan Liu, Qi Xi, Yang Weng (2025). Impact of urinary microplastic exposure on cognitive function in primary school children. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118532

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118532

Cited in: –

[41]other peer reviewed

Sibah Hasan, Shu K. E. Tam, F. Foster, Vladyslav V. Vyazovskiy, David M. Bannerman, Stuart N. Peirson (2021). Modulation of recognition memory performance by light and its relationship with cortical EEG theta and gamma activities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114404

DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114404

Cited in: –

[42]other peer reviewed

Quadros Vanessa A, Rosa Luiz V, Costa Fabiano V, Koakoski Gessi, Barcellos Leonardo J G, Rosemberg Denis B (2021). Predictable chronic stress modulates behavioral and neuroendocrine phenotypes of zebrafish: Influence of two homotypic stressors on stress-mediated responses.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2021.109030

DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2021.109030

Cited in: –

[43]other peer reviewed

Ruey‐Kuang Cheng, Jazlynn Xiu Min Tan, Kai Xin Chua, Cheryl Jia Xin Tan, Caroline Lei Wee (2022). Osmotic Stress Uncovers Correlations and Dissociations Between Larval Zebrafish Anxiety Endophenotypes. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.900223

DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.900223

Cited in: –

[44]other peer reviewed

Halyna Tkachenko, Lyudmyla Buyun, Renata Kołodziejska, Piotr Kamiński, Natalia Kurhaluk (2025). Neuroactive Phytochemicals as Multi-Target Modulators of Mental Health and Cognitive Function: An Integrative Review. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188907

DOI: 10.3390/ijms26188907

Cited in: –

[45]other peer reviewed

McGlashan E M, Coleman M Y, Vidafar P, Phillips A J K, Cain S W (2019). Decreased sensitivity of the circadian system to light in current, but not remitted depression.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.076

DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.076

Cited in: –

[46]other peer reviewed

Lunn Ruth M, Blask David E, Coogan Andrew N, Figueiro Mariana G, Gorman Michael R, Hall Janet E (2017). Health consequences of electric lighting practices in the modern world: A report on the National Toxicology Program's workshop on shift work at night, artificial light at night, and circadian disruption.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.056

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.056

Cited in: –

[47]other peer reviewed

Sarah L. Chellappa, Antoine Viola, Christina Schmidt, Valérie Bachmann, Virginie Gabel, Micheline Maire (2011). Human Melatonin and Alerting Response to Blue-Enriched Light Depend on a Polymorphism in the Clock Gene PER3. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2391

DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-2391

Cited in: –

[48]systematic review

Tähkämö Leena, Partonen Timo, Pesonen Anu-Katriina (2019). Systematic review of light exposure impact on human circadian rhythm.. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2018.1527773

DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1527773

Cited in: –

[49]other peer reviewed

Colwill Ruth M, Creton Robbert (2011). Imaging escape and avoidance behavior in zebrafish larvae.. https://doi.org/10.1515/rns.2011.008

DOI: 10.1515/rns.2011.008

Cited in: –

[50]other peer reviewed

Mirjam Münch, Vivien Bromundt (2012). Light and chronobiology: implications for health and disease. https://doi.org/10.31887/dcns.2012.14.4/mmuench

DOI: 10.31887/dcns.2012.14.4/mmuench

Cited in: –